I cannot believe that in the current climate of protecting children from harm, the every child matters initiative, and all the other ways to keep children from harm, that a story like this one can occur.
I mean, come on. When you read that a school cannot evict a convicted paedophile from a caretakers house within it's own grounds because...
a judge refused an eviction bid in December saying [Timothy] Martin had a tenancy agreement and had not been convicted...The judge said under the law he had an assured short term tenancy agreement and was allowed to remain.
Hello!! What about the law that the children should be able to attend school without being at risk from - and I say it again - a convicted paedophile?
What is more important here - the safety and protection of a school full of children, or a piddling little tenacy agreement of a society deviant??
